[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Heavy Symbols and such
Steven Ball wrote:
> If we decide that heavy symbols are really needed, it would be nice to
> have a footprint browser in gschem or something that helps specify
> when you place the symbol on the schematic that I want this footprint,
> and here's a preview of what it would look like. Would save a lot of
> flipping back and forth.
>
> -hamster
Careful. After all that agreeing with Steve, you're saying heavy symbols as if they drove it.
He's saying they should only be generated by "it".
I don't think we'll find "it" on ebay.
John Griessen
PS Why doesn't Steve use spells checkers? Because he knows we know what he's talking about,
and time is precious.
--
Ecosensory Austin TX
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user