Re: gEDA-user: hierarchy and refdes_renum

[Anthony Shanks <yamazakir2@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hmm, a few things.

Is that ground symbol the default that comes with gschem (device=none,
netname=0)? Can't look right now, at work.

I also noticed a few things in your schematic that is definitely not
supported (right now):

C 47000 49500 1 0 0 spice-lib.sym
C 50000 44900 1 0 0 v2i_2v.sym

What are these? I assume the spice-lib.sym is a subckt netlist but I
don't know what the other is.

A quick fix in your case with the ground symbol is just to add the
attribute device=globalnode and net=0.

-Anthony

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, A.Burinskiy<alexbour@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Yes, there is device that is not in the list and this is ground symbol.
> Please find diff file and test_v2i.sch attached. That is what I have (Please
> note, that your search for '=' sign, while there is no any '=' sign in the
> string...)
>
> $ spnet test_v2i.sch
>
> spNet v0.9.1.2
> gEDA/gschem Netlister
> Copyright 2009 Anthony Shanks
>
> -I- Starting Build of Cell: test_v2i
> -I- Adding Library: "sym"
> -I- Adding Library: "power"
> -I- Combining Cells
>
> -E- Fatal Error: Invalid Component attr "C 42200 44200 1 0 0 gnd-1.sym".
>
> $ more ~/.spnetlibs
> library: /home/username/tsmc "sym"
> library: /usr/local/share/gEDA/sym "power"
>
>
>
> On 06/23/2009 09:39 AM, Anthony Shanks wrote:
>>
>>    Comments are not supported yet, it's on the todo list.
>>
>>
>>
>>    Is the new code working yet? the invalid compoent error will come up
>>    with there is a symbol in your schematic without a valid device
>>    attribute. Here is a list of devices that are current supported
>>    (device=)
>>
>>
>>
>>    RESISTOR
>>
>>    CAPACITOR
>>
>>    INDUCTOR
>>
>>    NPN_TRANSISTOR
>>
>>    PNP_TRANSISTOR
>>    NMOS3T
>>
>>    NMOS4T
>>
>>    PMOS3T
>>
>>    PMOS3T
>>
>>    SUBCKT
>>    VOLTAGE_SOURCE
>>    CURRENT_SOURCE
>>
>>    PIN
>>
>>
>>
>>    As stated I will add suport for [N|P]MOS_TRANSISTOR in the next
>>    release as a 4 terminal mosfet device. Besides this, do you have any
>>    components in your schematic that is not on the above list?
>>
>>
>>
>>    BTW, thanks for all your help in debugging.
>>
>>
>>
>>    -Anthony
>>
>>    On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, A.Burinskiy<[1]alexbour@xxxxxxxxx>
>>    wrote:
>>
>>      Hi Anthony,
>>      Yes, the cause of segfault are empty strings at the end of file. Do
>>      you
>>      support comment out in .spnetlibs? I will go ahead and try your new
>>      code.
>>      Thanks,
>>      Alex
>>
>>    On 06/23/2009 03:03 AM, Anthony Shanks wrote:
>>    >  Wow. I guess I have a lot to learn as far as releasing code and
>>    >  compiling versions go because it works fine on my end with gcc 4.3.
>>    >  Sorry this is the first time I've released code (this big), please
>>    >  bare with me.
>>    >
>>    >  I tried one lib in spnetlibs with your line exactly and it works
>>    fine
>>    >  without a segfault. Can you attach your spnetlibs to ensure I'm 100%
>>    >  using exactly? One thing I did notice though is that if the file
>>    >  exists but is empty it does segfault. I just fixed this error and
>>    >  reuploaded it but I think it may go back to giving you the invalid
>>    lib
>>    >  error (you can redownload it from the same link). Are you sure there
>>    >  are not blank lines or anything in your file?
>>    >
>>    >  Also about number 1 and number 2 thoughts. That plan was already in
>>    >  the works for the official release. Most of the symbols from gschem
>>    >  work with spnet except the mosfets since geda does not have a 3
>>    >  terminal symbol. I plan on making [N,P]MOS_TRANSISTOR work for 4
>>    >  terminal devices. Also I plan for spnet to read the libraries
>>    already
>>    >  defined in the gEDA rc files. This will also be done in the next
>>    >  release. I'll try to get a version that does this by the end of the
>>    >  week however.
>>    >
>>    >  Let me know how it goes after you try the newest update.
>>    >
>>    >  -Anthony
>>    >
>>    >
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    geda-user mailing list
>>    [2]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>    [3]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>>
>> References
>>
>>    1. mailto:alexbour@xxxxxxxxx
>>    2. mailto:geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>    3. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>>
>>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geda-user mailing list
>> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user