On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 19:23 -0500, David W. Schultz wrote: > On 05/01/2011 07:01 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote: > > Are there any gschem oldtimers around who can explain the rational for > > the :1 requirement ? > > If there's no good reason for it I'd be happy to write a patch that removes it. > > I am not an old timer but I believe that this is required to attach that > net name to pin 1 of the symbol. The net name doesn't actually include > the :1. Exactly right - and there is a reluctance (certainly from me) to create special cases where that attribute can be dropped for single pin symbols. I'm quite keen to see John Dotty's suggestion (or a variant of it) implemented though. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user