[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Confirm new Tor server working? [SOLVED]



On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:53:43AM -0700, Brian C wrote:
> There was a power blackout Wednesday for several hours and so I had to
> restart my server. (So much for the 150+ day uptime I had...) Tor now
> works without me editing anything else or doing anything else. My server
> appears in the directory lists and when I type netstat I see LOTS and
> LOTS of ESTABLISHED connections. I don't know what fixed it exactly, but
> the unintentional reboot seems to have worked magic.

Great. Except,

% telnet 64.36.3.34 9001
Trying 64.36.3.34...
telnet: connect to address 64.36.3.34: Connection refused

Looks like it's still refusing connections?

> I've noticed that my web sites that run from this server are a little
> sluggish now, so I've investigated bandwidth shaping.
> 
> I understand AccountingStart and AccountingMax and will try those, but
> the FAQ didn't provide an example of the format to use for
> 
> BandwidthRate [what goes here?]
> BandwidthBurst [what goes here?]

See the man page, or http://tor.eff.org/tor-manual.html

Something like "200 KB" goes in the 'what goes here', to mean 200
kilobytes per second.

> Do I just put numbers out beside those? in Mb/s? or what?
> 
> Also, it seems another useful setting would be something like
> MaxConnections so that I could limit the number of simultaneous
> connections. A recent check showed over 200 simultaneous connections.
> AACK! Can I move that down somehow?

No, you can't move that down. 200 is a small number really; many servers
use 1024 or more. Are connections a limited resource for you somehow?

Thanks,
--Roger