Re: gEDA-user: Symbol question - suggestions?

["Johnny Rosenberg" <gurus.knugum@xxxxxxxxx>]

Den 2011-01-08 20:39:41 skrev John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>:

> On Jan 8, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > Den 2011-01-08 16:33:06 skrev John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:06 AM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, if I decide to use a 74-power symbol after all, is there any way  
> > > > I can design it making it automatically understand where it belongs,  
> > > > so I don't need to manually enter all those âU1, U2, U3â und so  
> > > > weiter?
> > > >
> > > > If I wanted a lot of work, I could draw my components with a pen on a  
> > > > piece of paper and then scan the whole thingâ
> > >
> > > Perhaps you want symbols with hidden power pins. They're not as  
> > > flexible as putting in the power symbols explicitly, but they may be  
> > > right for your application. In my applications, I often have multiple  
> > > power nets, so it is essential to be explicit.
> > >
> > > John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> > > http://www.noqsi.com/
> > > jpd@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > You mean like the default symbols with lines like the following?
> >
> > net=Vcc:14
> > net=GND:7
>
> Yes.
>
> John Doty

Well, I think that would work best for what I'm doing. I think I will go  
that way, at least until I run into some kind of case where this does not  
workâ
Maybe my symbols won't be interesting then for anybody else than me, but  
it doesn't hurt to share them anyway, I guess. I could include some kind  
of warning, I guess.
--
Kind regards

Johnny Rosenberg


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user