[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: discussion on what busses *mean*
On Aug 15, 2010, at 5:00 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> But in Paul's approach, every connection is a bus.
>
> To use your own words: But synthesis is not the only geda flow!
>
> With physical electronics, individual electrical connections are
> fundamental, and groupings are synthetic. They're totally distinct
> concepts, unlike in synthesis.
I completely disagree. An individual connection is simply a group of one.
Kernighan and Pike's "Program design in the UNIX environment" is one of the greatest papers on software design ever written. Their first example of a well designed program is "cat", whose most common use is displaying a single file, a special case of concatenation. There is no need for a special program to cover that special case: the general program works fine.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user